Power Engineering

Time To Reconsider EPA’s “Citizens’ Suit” Regime

By Richard G. Stoll, Partner, Foley & Lardner LLP

It’s hard to keep up with the barrage of new EPA rules. You’ve probably read about EPA’s new multi-billion dollar rules for electric utilities such as the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) and greenhouse gas (GHG) New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), as well as EPA’s new (June 2012) proposal for tighter particulate matter (PM) air quality standards. And that’s just scratching the surface.

You may have also seen trade press headlines like: “Activists Sue for Coal Ash Rule Deadline;” “Activists Eye Lead NAAQS Lawsuit;” “Suits to Enforce 1997 PM NAAQS Amid Uncertainty Over New Limit.”

Is there a link between such lawsuits and EPA’s rule barrage? Absolutely. EPA was forced to issue all three of the rulemakings mentioned above, for instance, under court-ordered deadlines. This is true of hundreds of EPA rules over the last few years.

As long as “citizens’” groups stand ready, willing, and able to sue, this rule barrage is inevitable under the laws Congress has enacted for EPA. Starting with the Clean Air Act in 1970 and following up with other EPA statutes, Congress has mandated that EPA issue a multitude of rules by specified deadlines. And Congress has included provisions allowing citizens suits in federal court to enforce these deadlines.

With its limited resources and such a plethora of deadlines for highly complex rules, EPA is almost always late. When EPA misses a deadline, activist groups are thus gifted by Congress with a slam-dunk case for a court order specifying a new deadline. Congress even provides attorneys’ fees for such plaintiffs from the U.S. Treasury.

When EPA believes it will be unable to comply with a judicial deadline, it is forced to seek an extension. The degree to which the court might acquiesce is often dependent upon whether the plaintiffs agree. As a result, citizens’ groups often have great bargaining power over the timing – and sometimes even the direction – of EPA’s rulemaking.

Congress’ citizens’ suit regime for EPA has no parallel in other federal agencies. And it produces several unfortunate results. First, EPA rules are usually lengthy and complex, requiring input from different types of professionals on EPA’s staff. When they are forced to hurry, the result can be a mess.

A good example is the final oil and gas NSPS EPA’s Administrator signed this April under a citizen suit deadline. When regulated parties began reading the 500+ page document, they became seriously confused. They found dozens of contradictory and inconsistent provisions, and key definitions that were indecipherable. Even worse, last year EPA was forced under court order to issue final “Boiler MACT” and related rules. EPA asked the judge for 15 additional months to come up with defensible rules, but the Sierra Club objected. The judge sided with the Sierra Club.

The resulting rushed rules had so many fundamental problems that EPA had to start a “reconsideration” process, stay the effect of the rules, and go back to the drawing board with a new round of rulemaking. When EPA has to clean up messes with new rounds of rulemaking, everyone’s resources are wasted.

Second, simply as a matter of good government, you would think EPA’s management should be the ones to decide the order and pace of new rules in carrying out their responsibility to protect health and the environment. But under the regime Congress has established, the order and pace is often determined by activists groups choosing which of the multitude of rule deadlines they deem most important.

Finally, judicial deadlines can compromise the “inter-agency review” process managed by the President’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). Under a key Executive Order issued by President Clinton (and recently enhanced by President Obama), OIRA is charged with assuring that all Executive Branch agencies’ major rules are analyzed and issued in consideration of costs, benefits and other societal impacts, and that such rules must adopt the least burdensome approach allowed under law.

During this process, EPA’s draft rules are sometimes revised to better balance economic and other societal concerns. Under the Executive Orders, the inter-agency review period is 90 days, and this period is often extended when a careful review is needed. With court-ordered deadlines, however, this process can be significantly truncated, and the valuable balancing that might be achieved can be jeopardized.

Again, Congress has saddled no other federal agency with anything comparable to the rulemaking-by-judicial-deadline regime imposed on EPA. Now that we have 40 years’ worth of EPA rules on the books, it may be a good time for Congress to reconsider.

Author: Stoll practices at Foley & Lardner’s DC office. He wrote “Effective EPA Advocacy,” published in 2011.

Sponsored by FLSmidth

Related Articles

Cap-and-trade plan would make top polluters pay

The state's largest polluters would have to pay for their carbon pollution under companion bills introduced in the Legislature Friday.

GE gas-fired turbines to power TVA coal replacement project

GE (NYSE: GE) will supply two natural gas-fired turbine generators to help in the replacement of a coal-fired power plant in Tennessee.

Follow Power Engineering on Twitter
Latest News
Rhode Island natural gas-fueled power plant

Chicago firm to build clean energy facility in Rhode Island

A Chicago-based company that plans to build an energy facility in Rhode Island says it will c...
States to fight EPA carbon emissions rule

Nebraska to join other states challenging new EPA rules

Nebraska Attorney General Doug Peterson says the state will join others in a legal fight agai...
Hydropower tops power generation share in Canada over next decade

Hydropower tops power generating sources in Canada, report says

Hydropower will continue to be the dominant power generation source in Canada over the next t...
Mitsubishi Hitachi group launches precipitator unit

Mitsubishi Hitachi companies launch emissions control unit

Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Ltd. (MHPS), Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Mechatronics System...
China US nuclear deal passes congressional review

US-China nuclear agreement passes congressional review

An agreement allowing American involvement in China's civilian atomic industry is set to be r...
NRC special inspection at Honeywell uranium hexafluoride leak

NRC begins special inspection at uranium enrichment facility

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) launched a special inspection at a uranium conve...
House GOP says they have votes against Iran nuclear deal

House GOP says it has the votes to disapprove of Iran deal

House Republicans said Monday that they have the GOP votes to disapprove of the Iran nuclear ...
Winners and losers in Clean Power Plan Associated Press

Who wins and loses under Obama's stricter power plant limits

President Barack Obama is mandating even steeper greenhouse gas cuts from U.S. power plants t...

Power Engineering Current Issue

12/01/2014
Volume 118, Issue 12
1412pe-cover1
Products Showcase
Dynamic Fluoride Ion cleaning DFIC of industrial natural gas turbines Hi-Tech Furnace Systems

Dynamic Fluoride Ion Cleaning of IGT Parts

The Dynamic Fluoride Ion Cleaning (DFIC) Process from Hi-Tech Furnace Systems is able to clean deep, narrow cracks of oxides by cycling between negative, atmospheric, and positive pressure.

Archived Articles

2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013

Power Industry Wire News

Emerald Oil Reports Second Quarter 2015 Financial and Operational Results, Guidance Increase, Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility Update

Emerald Oil Reports Second Quarter 2015 Financial and Operational Results, Guidance Inc...

EnerCom, Inc. to Host 100+ E&P, Oilfield Service and MLP Companies at the Oil & Gas Conference(R) 20; Conference Dates Are August 16-20, 2015

EnerCom, Inc. to Host 100+ E&P, Oilfield Service and MLP Companies at the Oil & Gas Con...

Ideal Power Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2015 Results

Ideal Power Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2015 Results

Ternium Announces Second Quarter and First Half 2015 Results

Ternium Announces Second Quarter and First Half 2015 Results

Android Tablet Opportunities for VARs/Resellers

Android Tablet Opportunities for VARs/Resellers

Power Engineering

Article Archives for Power Engineering Magazine

Continuing Education

Professional Development Hours

To access a course listing associated to a specific topic listed below, click on the topic of choice from the list below.

Latest Energy Jobs

View more Job Listings >>