What are the implications of CSAPR delays?

Emissions control efforts are once again in flux after the U.S. District Court of Appeals recently granted a request to stay the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Cross State Air Pollution Rule. What does the postponement of implementing the rule mean for the industry, and when will CSAPR go into effect?

The rule, which was originally scheduled to be effective beginning Jan. 1, is set to limit sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions from power plants in 27 states. Several states, including Kansas and Texas, and power producers such as Luminant, Westar Energy and American Electric Power Co. (NYSE: AEP) sued the EPA prior to the stay announcement, saying the original Jan. 1 start date did not provide states and utilities enough time to meet the limits.

Luminant had planned to shut down units 1 and 2 at the Monticello coal-fired power plant on Jan. 1 to comply with CSAPR, but has continued operating them after the stay was granted.

Gov. Rick Perry (R-Texas) applauded the Court’s decision to stay CSAPR, saying that a Jan. 1 implementation date would have cost hundreds of Texans their jobs, including those working at the Luminant units. “Texas will now have a chance to discuss the devastating impact that this rule will have on our state’s economy and electric reliability – an opportunity that we were not given by the Obama Administration’s out of control EPA when they adopted the rule,” he said in a Dec. 30 press statement.
While the stay does provide a temporary reprieve for affected power generators, it does not guarantee that the Court will prevail in changing the rule, said Todd Palmer, an environmental lawyer with Michael Best & Friedrich LLP. However, this delay will allow the Court to hear all sides of the argument.

For now, the Court is deciding a process for companies and states to submit briefs. The Court is scheduled to submit a proposed briefing schedule and format by Jan. 17. Once the Court has reviewed the briefs, it is expected that a hearing may be held in April.

Palmer said it seems unlikely that the hearing will be able to take place that early, though. “If you back-calculate the time involved in all the briefs necessary to lead up to a hearing, that gives very little time for all the interested parties to brief the Court on all the concerns they have with the rule,” he said.

Kathleen Bassi, an attorney with Schiff Hardin who was previously with Illinois EPA, said it is likely that the hearing will be delayed until May or June, and that the decision could come three to four months after the arguments.

During this interim period, the Clean Air Interstate Rule is in effect for SO2 and NOx emissions at affected power plants.

The rule in question has brought the subject of the future of electric reliability under speculation. While some in the industry are applauding CSAPR’s postponement, this delay raises the possibility that CSAPR and the recently finalized Utility MACT will be implemented in near synchronicity.

Whether a delay in CSAPR implementation would also cause a delay in Utility MACT implementation, however, is unlikely, Bassi said. “A delay of the Utility MACT will depend on the outcome of appeals of Utility MACT. In the Court’s eyes, the two are totally independent.”

Palmer said one of the biggest concerns over CSAPR is whether the industry will be able to obtain all of the emissions control equipment needed in a timely manner. “There may be a larger number of people looking for supplies than what the market can supply,” he said. Another concern, he said, is a potential shortage of welders and other personnel.

For now, however, companies must wait for the Court’s decision on CSAPR before choosing compliance technologies. “Until there’s a final rule in hand, most companies don’t have the authority to start spending the money for compliance.”

Read more emissions regulation news

Sponsored by FLSmidth

Related Articles

 APPA chief calls EPA CO2 plan ‘simply unworkable’

APPA chief calls EPA CO2 plan ‘simply unworkable’

American Public Power Association (APPA) President and CEO Susan Kelly told the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Feb. 19 that reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) is important but the current proposal from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as currently drafted is not ready for prime time.

Energy study: EPA’s Clean Power Plan will not jeopardize reliability of U.S. power system

Energy study: EPA’s Clean Power Plan will not jeopardize reliability of U.S. power system

The design and implementation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Power Plan, which is intended to reduce the U.S. electric system’s CO2 emissions by 30 percent from 2005 levels by 2030, will not jeopardize or compromise the reliability of the U.S. power system, according to a study by Analysis Group energy experts.

Follow Power Engineering on Twitter
Latest News

EIA: Coal-fired generation alive and well in the coming decade

Coal-fired power generation from existing plants will increase through 2025, this according t...

Report: Nuke dump radiation leak could have been prevented

A radiation leak that forced the indefinite closure of the federal government's only undergro...

Areva’s nuclear reactor vessel flaws may be “costly”

The French nuclear regulator says anomalies found in Areva’s nuclear reactor technology are “...

Southern Power acquires 32MW solar project from First Solar

Southern Co. (NYSE: SO) subsidiary, Southern Power, has acquired controlling interest in...

Second robot completes survey of Fukushima reactor containment vessel

A second shape-shifting robot completed a survey from inside of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear...

PacifiCorp considers joining California ISO

PacifiCorp signed a memorandum of understanding to explore full participation in the Californ...

Herbert: Uranium shouldn't be in Utah before federal review

Gov. Gary Herbert said Thursday that he wants federal regulators to review how hazardous a ty...

Environmentalists press for bill to expand solar power

Environmentalists are urging lawmakers to back a bill they say would help more residents inve...

Power Engineering Current Issue

02/01/2015
Volume 119, Issue 2
1502PE-cover
Products Showcase
Dynamic Fluoride Ion cleaning DFIC of industrial natural gas turbines Hi-Tech Furnace Systems

Dynamic Fluoride Ion Cleaning of IGT Parts

The Dynamic Fluoride Ion Cleaning (DFIC) Process from Hi-Tech Furnace Systems is able to clean deep, narrow cracks of oxides by cycling between negative, atmospheric, and positive pressure.

Archived Articles

2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015

Power Industry Wire News

Dais Analytic Corporation Appoints Eliza Wang to Board of Directors

Dais Analytic Corporation Appoints Eliza Wang to Board of Directors

Magnum Hunter Resources Chairman and CEO to Present at IPAA OGIS New York 2015

Magnum Hunter Resources Chairman and CEO to Present at IPAA OGIS New York 2015

GEI Global Energy Corp. Explores Solar Opportunities

GEI Global Energy Corp. Explores Solar Opportunities

Envision Solar Installs Solar-Powered EV Charging Stations in San Francisco as Part of "Driving on Sunshine" Campaign

Envision Solar Installs Solar-Powered EV Charging Stations in San Francisco as Part of ...

ZBB Energy and Solar Power, Inc. (SPI) Announce Global Strategic Partnership With an Initial Supply Agreement Valued at Between $80 Million and $120 Million

ZBB Energy and Solar Power, Inc. (SPI) Announce Global Strategic Partnership With an In...

Power Engineering

Article Archives for Power Engineering Magazine

Continuing Education

Professional Development Hours

To access a course listing associated to a specific topic listed below, click on the topic of choice from the list below.

Latest Energy Jobs

View more Job Listings >>