Yucca Mountain not an option for nuclear waste, DOE official says

The Yucca Mountain site in Nevada is not an option for storing toxic waste from nuclear power plants, said Deputy Energy Secretary Daniel Poneman on the sidelines of an international meeting to strengthen global nuclear safety after Japan's Fukushima atomic crisis.

"It is time to turn the page and try to find a better set of solutions," he told Reuters in an interview June 20.

The plan to house atomic waste at Yucca was approved by President George W. Bush in 2002. In 2010, the Obama administration asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to pull an application to license the site and named a panel of experts to look for other options.

In April, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce launched an investigation into the administration's decision to abandon plans to build a repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada.

Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., is leading the probe into the decision to stop the project. He and John Shimkus, R-Ill., chairman of the Environment and the Economy Subcommittee, sent letters March 31 to Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Gregory Jaczko asking about the decision to halt the repository. The two House leaders said a review of the available evidence indicates that "there was no scientific or technical basis for withdrawing the application."

Speaking to Reuters, Poneman said in June, "I think any policy -- the success of which can only be measured over many decades -- can only succeed with strong bipartisan support and strong support from the communities affected."

"It was equally clear that Yucca mountain was not going to have that kind of support," he said.

The United States still sees nuclear energy as having a "very important role to play in a low carbon future," Poneman was quoted as saying. "It is not a decision for governments to make but rather for utilities to make when those reactors will be economically viable to build. But it is certainly something that we are still supporting," Poneman said.

Subscribe to Nuclear Power International magazine.

Sponsored by FLSmidth
Font Sizes:
Recommend this article Recommend this article () You recommended this article You recommended this article ()
Follow Power Engineering on Twitter

Latest News

Shutterstock coal production trucks

Weekly Coal Production

The Weekly Coal Production shows how much coal is being produced across the U.S.

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Weekly Economic Indicators financial business

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas' Economic Indicators

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas offers a glimpse into how the markets are doing domestical...

Kvaerner awarded contract for gas-fired power plant in Delaware

Kvaerner North American Construction Inc. and its joint venture partner, Parsons Brinckerhoff...

Canadian Solar purchases two solar projects

Canadian Solar Inc. has acquired a majority interest in two utility-scale solar power project...

Operators Restart Unit 2 at PPL Susquehanna

Unit 2 at the PPL Susquehanna nuclear power plant near Berwick, Pa. resumed generating electr...

Settlement agreement limits cost recovery at Edwardsport

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) on Dec. 27 modified and approved a settlemen...

Toshiba in talks to sell portion of Westinghouse nuclear unit

Toshiba Corp is in talks  to sell up to 16% of its stake in the Westinghouse Electric Co...

Utah nixes nuclear waste storage facility

Plans to park radioactive waste at a storage facility in Utah have been officially called off.

Current Magazine Issue

04/01/2013
Volume 117, Issue 4
1304pe-cover

Watch POWER-GEN 2012

Power Engineering

Article Archives for Power Engineering Magazine

Archived Articles

2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013

Continuing Education

Professional Development Hours

To access a course listing associated to a specific topic listed below, click on the topic of choice from the list below.