AmerenUE's new barge unloading facility moves twice the coal at half the horse-power

July 1, 2002 -- Flooding at AmerenUE's Sioux Plant, 30 miles up the Mississippi River from St. Louis, is always a concern for the plant's management.

Although the plant is on high ground, the plant can be isolated when the Mississippi River floods. When this happens the roads and the single rail line coming into the plant become impassible. As a result, coal trains cannot get in, and employees are forced to commute across the river by ferry from Alton, Illinois, a one-hour trip. A flood in 1993 isolated the Sioux Plant for 13 weeks.

Because of the flooding potential, AmerenUE's Sioux Plant has recently completed the installation of a new E-Crane barge unloading facility. Sioux plant's new barge unloading facility provides an alternate delivery route for coal. With the new barge unloading facility, the plant is no longer dependent on rail deliveries that can be interrupted by spring floods. In addition, with an annual capacity of 3.7 million tons of coal, the barge-unloading facility can support future increases in generating capacity.

Barge Unloader

The E-Crane equilibrium crane features a moving counterweight. As the arm extends out, the counterweight extends back. Likewise, as the arm moves in, the counterweight also moves in. At 75 percent of its maximum reach the E-crane, with a full payload, is in precise balance. Working with the arm either at maximum reach or nearly under the cab, the weight of the entire E-Crane, plus half of its payload, is balanced.

In operation, the E-Crane never has to lift anything heavier than half its payload of 12 cubic yards of coal. On the other hand, excavators and cable cranes have to lift the full payload, plus the weight of the boom and arm. They must also be counterbalanced for the most extreme anticipated condition.

The barge unloading system, equipped with a 24 cubic foot clamshell bucket, can reach out 86 feet horizontally. It is also able to continue unloading barges even when the river rises or falls 25 feet. The free-dig rate of the E-Crane is 1,800 tons/hr. Unloading a barge containing 1,500 tons of coal takes less than 90 minutes. However, because of the confined space within the barge and the need to unload the coal evenly, the barge must be moved frequently.

Unloading Barges at Sioux Plant

The barge unloading system is mounted on a 32-foot diameter cell. Basically the cell is an artificial island made by driving lengths of sheet steel into the riverbed, filling the resulting cell with rock, and capping it with concrete. Two additional cells were also constructed, one upriver and the other downriver. Four permanently moored barges form a dock between the center cell and the two other cells. The floating dock to which the barges are moored is allowed to rise and fall with the river.

A cable system controlled from the cab of the E-Crane moves two loaded barges back and forth along the dock for balanced unloading. As the barges are emptied they are moved to a transit area downriver. Fully loaded barges waiting to unload wait in a staging area upriver. The staging area can dock up to 55 barges.

Coal unloaded from the barges is dumped into a hopper. From the hopper the coal is transferred onto a 60-inch wide conveyer belt to the plant. Before reaching the plant's coal storage yard the conveyor passes over 600 feet of environmentally sensitive wetland, across the plant's cooling-water discharge canal and eventually to the plant - a total distance of about 2,200 feet.

To minimize environmental disturbances to the wetlands and the river, most of the equipment, including the barge unloader, was brought in by barge and erected using conventional cranes mounted on barges. Total construction time was less than a year.

The Selection Process

AmerenUE engineers looked at four alternatives for barge unloading-an excavation-type digger similar in operation to a backhoe, a conventional crane with the clamshell bucket suspended from cables, the E-Crane, and a continuous bucket unloader.

However, the largest excavation digger available and a conventional crane with a clamshell bucket only had a capacity to unload 2 million tons a year, not enough for the project. Although a continuous bucket unloader is capable of handling up to 6 million tons a year, its cost was found to be prohibitive.

After evaluating the different options the AmerenUE engineers proposed to purchase a hydraulic E-Crane. Nonetheless, before making the final decision, AmerenUE engineers decided to tour barge unloading facilities at three companies using the E-Crane.

According to Michael Lobbig, project director for AmerenUE, the E-Crane was chosen because it met all of the plant's requirements and nothing else really fit the criteria. AmerenUE expects the E-Crane will be cost-effective in terms of operation and maintenance.

The E-Crane only requires a 600 hp electric motor to drive its hydraulics. In operation the barge unloader at the Sioux plant is reported to be quick and smooth to operate. "I think the E-Crane could pick up a piece of cardboard," says Tom Meyer, project engineer, AmerenUE.

In full-scale tests conducted by AmerenUE, the barge unloader emptied the barges without any problems. The only manual labor required was to move small quantities of coal out of corners of the barge into areas the E-Crane could reach. E-Crane International-USA will perform annual inspections and maintenance under a service agreement with AmerenUE.

This article is scheduled to appear in Power Engineering Magazine, July 2002. To read the current issue of Power Engineering, visit http://pe.pennnet.com/Articles/Print_TOC.cfm?Section=Articles&SubSection=CurrentIssue.


Sponsored by FLSmidth

Related Articles

Mergers, EPA carbon plan generated much attention during 2014

Mergers, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Clean Power Plan, cheap natural gas and the polar vortex were among the most noteworthy generation stories of 2014.

Group wants state regulators recused from PNM case

State regulators in less than two weeks are to begin deliberating a proposal that calls for shutting down part of an aging coal-fired power plant in northwestern New Mexico that serves more than 2 million customers in the Southwest.

But one environmental group, New Energy Economy, is calling for Public Regulation Commissioners Pat Lyons and Karen Montoya to recuse themselves from the deliberations.

Follow Power Engineering on Twitter
Latest News

Saber Partners to advise regulators on $1.3B Duke Energy deal

The Florida Public Service Commission has selected Saber Partners, LLC to advise it...
Dean Oskvig announces retirement from Black & Veatch

Black & Veatch names heads of Oil & Gas, Power businesses

Black & Veatch appointed two people to lead its Oil & Gas and Power business units. &...
Enphase Energy primary inverter supplier for Euro Energy Services solar PV projects

Enphase Energy chosen as primary technology partner by Euro Energy Services

Enphase Energy, Inc. has been chosen by Euro Energy Services, a major U.K. solar energy firm,...
Iberdrola wind output to Southern California Edison

SCE to buy output from planned 132-MW wind energy project

Iberdrola Renewables signed a 15-year contract to supply Southern California Edison (SCE) wit...
Tecogen supplies combined heat & power module to NY county government building

NY county gov't building to use cogeneration power unit

Tecogen Inc. (Nasdaq: TGEN) sold a combined heat and power (CHP) module for installation at a...
Portland General Electric says natural gas-fired power plant is 60% complete

Portland General Electric reports Carty plant 60% complete

Portland General Electric Co. (NYSE:POR) said July 28 that construction of the 440-MW Carty n...
PSEG Fossil natural gas-fired generating facility proposed

PSEG Fossil pursues new gas-fired capacity to replace deactivated Edison units

PSEG Fossil LLC has proposed a natural gas-fired generating facility located in Edison, New J...

Power Engineering Current Issue

03/01/2014
Volume 118, Issue 3
1403PE-cover
Products Showcase
Dynamic Fluoride Ion cleaning DFIC of industrial natural gas turbines Hi-Tech Furnace Systems

Dynamic Fluoride Ion Cleaning of IGT Parts

The Dynamic Fluoride Ion Cleaning (DFIC) Process from Hi-Tech Furnace Systems is able to clean deep, narrow cracks of oxides by cycling between negative, atmospheric, and positive pressure.

Archived Articles

2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013

Buyers Guide Categories

Power Industry Wire News

TGS Announces Q2 Revenues of USD 140 Million

TGS Announces Q2 Revenues of USD 140 Million

Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. Declares Distribution Increase and Reports Earnings for Second Quarter 2015

Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. Declares Distribution Increase and Reports Earnings for ...

Enbridge Energy Partners Announces Actions to Strengthen Midcoast Energy Partners and Planning Next Drop-Down to Midcoast in 2016

Enbridge Energy Partners Announces Actions to Strengthen Midcoast Energy Partners and P...

Quantum Energy Files North Dakota Air Quality Permit Application

Quantum Energy Files North Dakota Air Quality Permit Application

Industrial Info Resources Brings 50 New Jobs to Galway, Ireland

Industrial Info Resources Brings 50 New Jobs to Galway, Ireland

Power Engineering

Article Archives for Power Engineering Magazine

Continuing Education

Professional Development Hours

To access a course listing associated to a specific topic listed below, click on the topic of choice from the list below.

Latest Energy Jobs

View more Job Listings >>