Montana Power rates to rise 20% on supply, transition costs

By the OGJ Online Staff

HOUSTON, Oct. 30, 2001 — Montana Power Co. said it expects to pay $2 billion over the next 30 years as part of its transition from an integrated electric utility holding company to a utility supplying default power customers and transmission and distribution services.

The company estimated customers' bills will rise 20% or about $10/month, reflecting transition charges and higher costs for power. It said a new supply portfolio contains a mix of long and short-term contracts from new and existing generators to serve customers who have not chosen alternative suppliers, also known as default supply customers, beginning July 1, 2002.

The portfolio also includes existing long-term contracts with qualifying facilities (QFs) — power that federal law required Montana Power to purchase at rates set by the Montana Public Service Commission. Montana Power said it estimates about $1.2 billion of the total is at above market rates.

The company said it buys 100 Mw of electricity from QFs and intends to incorporate the power from these contracts at current market prices into the default supply portfolio that will serve customers who do not choose another electricity supplier.

Costs of the QF contracts will be partially offset by a $2/month charge to customers beginning in July 2002, in addition to gains from the company's $60 million sale of generating assets to PPL Montana, a unit of PPL Corp., Allentown, Pa. Montana Power said about $304.7 million in out-of-market costs would not be offset.

The company said its supply portfolio also includes increments of short-term power (less than 1 year) to round out the portfolio. The company is asking the commission to review all of the contracts to determine if they comply with the "prudency standard."

Jack Haffey, president of Montana Power's Utility Division, said the supply portfolio seeks to balance the need for fostering development of new generation resources with "wise use of existing resources."

Transition costs are the costs a company incurred and collected under regulation but will not be able to recover in a competitive market. These costs are allowed to be collected under Montana law.

Montana Power filed its first transition plan in July 1997 when the case was divided into two parts. The initial piece was concluded in 1998. The latest filings include all transition costs as a single one-time settlement and developing competitive transition charges, said Pat Corcoran, Montana Power's vice-president of regulatory affairs.

Sponsored by FLSmidth

Related Articles

Susquehanna nuclear unit 1 returned to service after leak found

Workers at PPL’s (NYSE: PPL) Susquehanna nuclear power plant reconnected Unit 1 to the grid after repairing a small leak inside the containment structure.

Water leak found at Pennsylvania nuclear plant

Operators of the Susquehanna nuclear power plant in central Pennsylvania say they have disconnected Unit One from the regional power grid after finding a small water leak inside the containment structure.

Follow Power Engineering on Twitter

Latest News

Wärtsilä to deliver natural gas engines to Montana-Dakota Utilities

Wärtsilä will supply a 19-MW Smart Power Generation power plant to Montana-Dakota Utilities (...

Clyde Bergemann to supply emissions control equipment to Polish cogeneration power plant

The Clyde Bergemann Power Group Europe has received at $10 million contract, from SBB Energy,...

India nuke deals still thorny for US despite 'breakthrough'

India and America's declaration of a breakthrough in contentious nuclear energy cooperation h...

W.Va. bill requires lawmakers to OK state carbon plan

A West Virginia Senate panel is considering requiring lawmakers to approve state plans to com...

US nuclear reactor shuts down during snowstorm

Officials say a Massachusetts nuclear power plant was forced to shut down during the blizzard...
Natural Ventilation

Power Engineering Photo of the Day

Solar energy supporters, utilities spar over legislation

Solar energy supporters are pushing back against a bill backed by Indiana's utilities that wo...
TEPCO Tokyo Electric Power Company water treatment radioactive contaminated Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant Nuclear Regulation Authority

TEPCO to miss radioactive water treatment deadline

Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) said it would miss a self-imposed deadline to decontaminate ...

Power Engineering Current Issue

Volume 118, Issue 3

Products Showcase

Dynamic Fluoride Ion cleaning DFIC of industrial natural gas turbines Hi-Tech Furnace Systems

Dynamic Fluoride Ion Cleaning of IGT Parts

The Dynamic Fluoride Ion Cleaning (DFIC) Process from Hi-Tech Furnace Systems is able to clean deep, narrow cracks of oxides by cycling between negative, atmospheric, and positive pressure.

Archived Articles

2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013

Power Industry Wire News

Walter Energy Suspends Dividend

Walter Energy Suspends Dividend

Synergy Resources Corporation Launches Common Stock Offering

Synergy Resources Corporation Launches Common Stock Offering

Surfrider Foundation Opposes Obama Administration Five-Year Plan to Open Offshore Drilling in the Atlantic and Arctic

Surfrider Foundation Opposes Obama Administration Five-Year Plan to Open Offshore Drill...

Veteran Backhaul Radio Engineer Jeff Rivard Joins LightPointe

Veteran Backhaul Radio Engineer Jeff Rivard Joins LightPointe

Abakan Appoints Stephen Goss as Chief Operating Officer

Abakan Appoints Stephen Goss as Chief Operating Officer

Power Engineering

Article Archives for Power Engineering Magazine

Continuing Education

Professional Development Hours

To access a course listing associated to a specific topic listed below, click on the topic of choice from the list below.

Latest Energy Jobs

View more Job Listings >>